In the shadow of greatness.
Some comparisons should never be made. This thought flashes into the mind the moment I hear the phrase ‘it is made in a Burgundian style’.
Shell and I standing in a cellar door on the Mornington Peninsula. It is a cold, wet June in 2016. Having already visited the Yarra Valley the day before, Mornington was the next stop on our journey South in Victorian wine country. The region, with Tasmania the exception, consistently produces Australia’s better Pinot Noirs. We had just been taken through some reasonable Chardonnay and two Pinot Noirs, all fine, but unremarkable.
Sensing our lack of awe, we are presented with the Reserve Pinot Noir from under the counter. Our host looks quickly around the Cellar Door and whispers in a conspiratorial voice ‘this is our Reserve Pinot, it is not for tasting, it is made in the Burgundian style’, as she pours us each a small tasting. My heart sinks and I cringe at the comment. It is not the first time I have heard the comparison in the last few days, and it won’t be the last.
The absurdity of the claim requires clarification. Burgundy is a complex study, but a general understanding of the region illustrates the problem with any New World Pinot making the Burgundian comparison.
Burgundy is a long thin strip of vineyards in the Eastern-Central region of France. From Dijon in the North to Mâcon in the South. Governed by strict AOC (appellation d’origine contrôlée), the area is planted almost exclusively to Pinot Noir and Chardonnay.
The Burgundy wine region is broken into five distinct wine-growing regions, from North to South, Chablis, almost exclusively planted to Chardonnay, Côte de Nuits, Côte de Beaune, Côte Chalonnaise and finally Mâconnais in the South. Each of these wine regions expresses the Pinot grape in an entirely unique style.
If we narrow our study to the Côte D’or, we have the two regions of Côte de Nuits and Côte de Beaune. Here are the two primary producers of world-class Burgundy and where the comparison is often made. Consider there are five regions, all producing a different expression of Burgundy, and we have now narrowed our focus to two, we can further break these regions into communes.
Digging further, from Côte D’or, to Côte de Nuits, there are fourteen communes in the Côte de Nuits, each expressing its own unique version of Burgundy.
If we consider just the famous commune of Gevrey-Chambertin, there are 35 individual vineyards, not including the Villages (more on this later). Each vineyard expresses its own individual Burgundy profile.
Finally, a quick note on vineyard classification. Effectively, these vineyards are designated under the AOC, and represent the single-vineyard, or climat. These are Gran Cru, Premier Cru and Villages. Again, each expressing its own version of Burgundy.
It is a lot to consume, but consider for a moment the statement from the perspective of a wine grown in Australia, or any Pinot Noir not grown in Burgundy, ‘it is made in the Burgundian style’.
What could that possibly mean? If the Burgundy style varies from the vineyard, to commune to region so vastly, What style is the reference to? If a vineyard separated by meters in the same commune is different to the next, how could you make a reference to such a complex region to a single style?
You can’t.
A rustic Beaune Premier Cru is so far removed from a masculine powerful Gran Cru from Gevrey-Chambertin it almost a completely different wine. Likewise, cross the road from Gevrey to Chambolle, and you have elegant, feminine wines with incredible complexity. The variation in Burgundy is staggering.